Konopka, Jaclyn A; Findlay, Andrea K; Eckstein, Felix; Dragoo, Jason L

Purpose:

To determine whether the use of an unloading brace can increase the thickness of cartilage regenerate after microfracture surgery.

Methods:

This is a randomized (1:1) controlled clinical trial. Twenty-four patients who underwent microfracture between 2012 and 2015 were identified and were randomly assigned to an unloading brace group or a no-brace group. All patients were kept non-weight bearing for the first eight weeks after surgery and then patients in the intervention group began using an unloading brace for an average of 63.9 (SD = 41.6) days to protect clot stability by exerting a varus or valgus force on the knee to decrease the force on the knee’s lateral or medial compartment, respectively. Quality of the cartilage repair was assessed with knee magnetic resonance imaging to determine repair tissue thickness (primary outcome), repair tissue volume, and T2 relaxation times at 12 and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with KOOS, Tegner, SF12, and Lysholm questionnaires at six, 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Results: 

Three patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 21 patients ultimately analyzed. The unloading brace repair tissue was greater than the no-brace group in volume (26.8 ± 23.7 mm3 vs - 8.4 ± 22.7 mm3, p = 0.005) and thickness (0.2 ± 0.2 mm versus - 0.4 ± 0.3 mm, p = 0.001) at 12 months and in cartilage thickness in the unloading brace group at 24 months (0.4 ± 0.4 mm versus - 0.1 ± 0.3 mm, p = 0.029). There was a positive correlation between wearing the brace longer and improved 6-month KOOS symptom scores (r = 0.82, p = 0.013), 6-month KOOS QOL scores (r = 0.80, p = 0.017), 6-month Tegner scores (r = 0.94, p = 0.002), and Tegner score changes from baseline to 6 months (r = 0.80, p = 0.032).

Conclusion:

This study found a significant mid-term increase in cartilage repair tissue thickness following unloading bracing in patients recovering from microfracture for isolated chondral defects.

Brace Studied:

Unloader One® 

Other Information:

Increase in cartilage repair thickness and volume

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Peterson, Wolf; Ellermann, Andree; Henning, Jörg; Nehrer, Stefan; Rembizki, ingo Volker; Fritz, Jürgen; Becher, Christopher, Albasini, Alfio, Zinser, Wolfgang; Laute, Volker; Ruhnau, Klaus; Stinus, Hartmut; Liebau, Christion

Background: 

The use of an unloader brace is a non-surgical treatment option for patients with medial osteoarthritis (OA). However, many patients do not adhere to brace treatment, because of skin irritation due to the pads at the level of the joint space and bad fit. A new concept to unload the medial compartment of the knee is a foot ankle brace with a lever arm pressing the thigh in valgus. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to examine the outcomes of patients with medial OA after treatment with a conventional knee unloader brace (Unloader One®) and the new foot ankle orthosis (Agilium FreeStep®).

Methods:

For this multicenter trial, 160 patients (> 35 years) with medial OA were randomly allocated to treatment with a conventional knee unloader brace (Unloader One®) or treatment with the new knee OA ankle brace (Agilium FreeStep®). The primary outcome measure was pain (numerical analog scale) at baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), and 6 months (T2). Secondary outcome measures were knee function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, KOOS), side effects, additional interventions, and compliance.

Results:

In both groups, walking pain improved between T0 and T1 and also between T0 and T2 without a significant group difference. For pain at sports, both groups showed a significant improvement between T0 and T2 without a significant group difference. The KOOS subscales symptoms, pain, activity, sport, and quality of life increased significantly in both treatment groups without any significant group differences at T 0, T1, and T2. There was also no significant group difference in additional interventions and weekly or daily brace use. In the Agilium FreeStep® group (23.5%), significantly less patients reported bruises in contrast to the Unloader One® group (66.7%).

Brace Studied:

Unloader One®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Hjartarson, Hjörtur; Toksvig-Larson, Sören

Background:

Treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis is challenging. Unloader braces have been developed with various success. Unloader One® Knee Brace is light, easily-fitted and shown to be effective by the unloading of the affected compartment. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical outcome of the brace vs. a placebo on patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods:

Initially 150 patients were randomized to receive either the Unloader brace or a control placebo group look-alike brace where the active strips had been removed. The patients were followed up at 6,12,26 and 52 weeks with Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The reason for dropout was recorded.

Results:

A total of 149 patients were included, 74 in the study and 75 in the control group. The mean age was 59.6 vs. 60.2, BMI was 27.5 vs. 26.9, 37% vs. 44% were women in the study vs. control group. Both groups showed improvement in KSS over 52 weeks, with the study group showing higher improvement in mean scores. KSS increased from 64.3 to 84.0 for the study group and from 64.0 to 74.6 for the control group (p = 0.009). The study group improved in KSS function from 67.0 to 78.6 (p < 0.001) and KOOS for knee related symptoms increased/improved from 64.3 to 72.4 (p < 0.001). Activity of daily living increased/improved from 65.3 to 75.2 and Sports/Recreation from 24.6 to 40.2 (p > 0.001) whereas the control group did not show significant improvements in any of the scores. The dropout was higher in the control group, 40 vs. 25.

Conclusions:

The brace seems to be more effective and better tolerated than the placebo.

Brace Studied:

Unloader One®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Lee, Paul YF; Winfield, Thomas G; Harris, Shaun RS; Storey, Emerald; Chandratreya, Amit

Background:

Unloading knee braces can provide good short-term pain relief for some patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (UOA). Their cost is relatively small compared with surgical interventions. However, no previous studies have reported their use over a duration of 5 years or more.

Methods:

Up to 8 years of prospective data were collected from 63 patients who presented with UOA. After conservative management with analgesia and physiotherapy, patients were offered an unloading brace. EQ-5D (EuroQol five dimensions) questionnaires were collected at baseline and after wearing the brace. Cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared with a total knee replacement (TKR) with an 8-month waiting duration and 8 years of results.

Results:

Patients experienced a mean increase in EQ-5D of 0.42 with an average duration of wear of 26.1 months resulting in an increase of 0.44 in QALYs with a mean cost of £625. The adoption of an unloader knee brace was found to be a short-term cost-effective treatment option with an 8-month incremental cost effectiveness ratio of £9599. Compared with no treatment, the unloader knee brace can be considered cost effective at 4 months or more. At 8 years follow-up, the unloader knee brace demonstrated QALYs gain of 0.43 and with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -£6467 compared with TKR.

Conclusion:

Unloading knee braces are cost effective for the management of UOA. These findings strongly support the undertaking of further research into the long-term impact of unloading knee brace. The unloader knee brace has benefits to the National Health Service for capacity, budget, waiting list duration, frequency of surgery and reducing the required severity of surgical intervention.

Brace Studied:

Unloader One®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Quality of Life Improvements Knee OA
• Delayed Surgery for Knee OA
• Cost-Effective Treatment

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Yu, Shirley P; Williams, Matthew; Eyles, Jillian P; Chen, Jian Sheng; Makovey, Joanna; Hunter, David J

Aim: 

Assessing the effectiveness of bracing treatment for tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) and patellofemoral OA in patients with knee OA.

Method:

This study was conducted within the Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program (OACCP), a 52-week multidisciplinary non-operative program for OA patients. All participants had symptomatic, radiographic knee OA. Knee bracing with Ossur Unloader One and Tru-pull Lite was offered for participants with medial/lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA, respectively. Participants were assessed at weeks 0, 12, 26 and 52. The primary outcome was knee pain and function at week 52, as assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain and activities of daily living (ADL) scores. Linear regression models were used to compare effectiveness for pain and function between three groups (patellofemoral bracing, tibiofemoral bracing and no bracing).

Result: 

There were 204 participants; 50 assigned patellofemoral bracing, 86 tibiofemoral bracing and 68 with no bracing. Mean baseline KOOS pain score was 52.9, 41.7 and 43.3 (0-100 scale where 100 represents normal) and mean baseline KOOS ADL score was 55.8, 43.7 and 43.1 for the three groups, respectively. Significant improvements were found in each group at week 52 for KOOS pain score and KOOS ADL. There was no significant difference in KOOS pain (P = 0.12) and ADL score (P = 0.13) at week 52 between the three brace types after adjusting for baseline variables.

Conclusion: 

A multidisciplinary non-operative program improved pain and function in persons with patellofemoral and tibiofemoral OA. However, wearing a patellofemoral or a tibiofemoral brace did not appear to provide additional benefits.

Brace Studied:

Unloader One®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Fu, Henry C; Lie, Chester W H; Ng, T P; Chen, K W; Tse, C Y; Wong, W H

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of various orthotic treatments for patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis.

Design: 

Prospective cohort study with sequential interventions.

Setting: 

University-affiliated hospital, Hong Kong.

Patients: 

From December 2010 to November 2011, 10 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were referred by orthopaedic surgeons for orthotic treatment. All patients were sequentially treated with flat insole, lateral-wedged insole, lateral-wedged insole with subtalar strap, lateral-wedged insole with arch support, valgus knee brace, and valgus knee brace with lateral-wedged insole with arch support for 4 weeks with no treatment break. Three-dimensional gait analysis and questionnaires were completed after each orthotic treatment.

Main outcome measures:

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale scores, and peak and mean knee adduction moments.

Results:

Compared with pretreatment, the lateral-wedged insole, lateral-wedged insole with arch support, and valgus knee brace groups demonstrated significant reductions in WOMAC pain score (19.1%, P=0.04; 18.2%, P=0.04; and 20.4%, P=0.02, respectively). The lateral-wedged insole with arch support group showed the greatest reduction in visual analogue scale score compared with pretreatment at 24.1% (P=0.004). Addition of a subtalar strap to lateral-wedged insoles (lateral-wedged insole with subtalar strap) did not produce significant benefit when compared with the lateral-wedged insole alone. The valgus knee brace with lateral-wedged insole with arch support group demonstrated an additive effect with a statistically significant reduction in WOMAC total score (-26.7%, P=0.01). Compliance with treatment for the isolated insole groups were all over 90%, but compliance for the valgus knee brace-associated groups was only around 50%. Gait analysis indicated statistically significant reductions in peak and mean knee adduction moments in all orthotic groups when compared with a flat insole.

Conclusions:

These results support the use of orthotic treatment for early medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Brace Studied:

Unloader One®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA

Other Information:

Reduction in EKAM with bracing

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Deie, Masataka; Shibuya, Hayatoshi; Toriyama, Minoru; Kumahashi, Nobuyuki; Uchio, Yuji; Sasashige, Yoshiaki; Ochi, Mitsuo

Objectives:

We evaluated whether a valgus knee brace and an insole with subtalar strapping could reduce pain and improve functional scores over 12 months in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods:

OA was confirmed by radiography in all patients, who were divided into three groups: exercise (n = 44), insole (n = 55), and brace (n = 19). Clinical knee functions and gait analyses were evaluated.

Results:

After 12 months, the clinical results for all groups had improved compared to pretreatment findings. Although the knee varus moment decreased and the gait speed increased when the insole was worn initially, the effects of the insole decreased at 6 and 12 months. In contrast, the knee varus moment decreased and the gait speed increased when the brace was initially fitted. The effects of the brace were maintained during the 12 months.

Conclusions:

The insole was effective for patients with Kellgren-Lawrence Grades II and III, and the knee brace was effective for patients with Grades III and IV conditions. Furthermore, the knee brace was more effective when worn for more than 6 months, while the effects of the insoles were not continuous.

Brace Studied:

Unloader One®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Functional Improvements Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Rebecca F. Moyer, Trevor B. Birmingham, Colin E. Dombroski, Robert F. Walsh, Kristyn M. Leitch, Thomas R. Jenkyn, J. Robert Giffin

Objective:

To test the hypothesis that a custom-fit valgus knee brace and custom-made lateral wedge foot orthotic will have greatest effects on decreasing the external knee adduction moment during gait when used concurrently.

Design:

Proof-of-concept, single test session, crossover trial.

Setting:

Biomechanics laboratory within a tertiary care center.

Participants:

Patients (n=16) with varus alignment and knee osteoarthritis (OA) primarily affecting the medial compartment of the tibiofemoral joint (varus gonarthrosis).

Interventions:

Custom-fit valgus knee brace and custom-made full-length lateral wedge foot orthotic. Amounts of valgus angulation and wedge height were tailored to each patient to ensure comfort.

Main Outcome Measures:

The external knee adduction moment (% body weight [BW]*height [Ht]), frontal plane lever arm (cm), and ground reaction force (N/kg), determined from 3-dimensional gait analysis completed under 4 randomized conditions: (1) control (no knee brace, no foot orthotic), (2) knee brace, (3) foot orthotic, and (4) knee brace and foot orthotic.

Results:

The reduction in knee adduction moment was greatest when concurrently using the knee brace and foot orthotic (effect sizes ranged from 0.3 to 0.4). The mean decrease in first peak knee adduction moment compared with control was .36% BW*Ht (95% confidence interval [CI], -.66 to -.07). This was accompanied by a mean decrease in frontal plane lever arm of .59cm (95% CI, -.94 to -.25).

Conclusions:

These findings suggest that using a custom-fit knee brace and custom-made foot orthotic concurrently can produce a greater overall reduction in the knee adduction moment, through combined effects in decreasing the frontal plane lever arm.

Brace Studied:

Unloader® XT Lite

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Reduction of Unicompartmental Load

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Briggs KK, Matheny LM, Steadman JR.

The purpose of this study was to determine if short form (SF)-12 physical component would increase with unloader brace use. Patient expectations and predictors of significant improvement were determined. Our hypothesis was that patients with unloader braces will have increases in general physical health (SF-12) and function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index [WOMAC]). Patients were enrolled in institutional review board-approved prospective cohort study. They completed a self-administered questionnaire (SF-12; WOMAC, Tegner activity scale, expectations) at enrollment, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months. In this study, 39 patients, 23 males and 16 females (average age = 61 years [range 44 to 87]), were prescribed an unloader brace. Patients had significant improvement in quality of life (SF-12) (p < 0.05). There was significant improvement in pain, stiffness, and function (WOMAC) (p < 0.05). Patients who reported Tegner of 3 or greater at final follow-up had significantly higher SF-12 physical component (48 vs. 37; p = 0.023). Return to recreational sports was very important in 83% and somewhat important in 17%. Improving ability to walk was very important in 89%. Pain relief was very important in 69%, somewhat important in 17%. Of these, 39% expected most pain to be relieved and 57% expected all pain to be relieved. The most important expectations were to have confidence in knee (97% very important), avoid future knee degeneration (90% very important), and improve ability to maintain general health (93% very important). Patients demonstrated a significant decrease in pain and disability. Patients saw improvement in SF-12 physical component. Braces specifically designed to unload the degenerative compartment of the knee can be an effective treatment to decrease pain and maintain activity level to increase overall physical health.

Brace Studied:

Unloader One®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA
• Quality of Life Improvements Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Toriyama, Minoru; Deie, Masataka; Shimada, Noboru; Otani, Takuya; Shidahara, Hiroe; Maejima, Hiroshi; Moriyama, Hideki; Shibuya, Hayatoshi; Okuhara, Atsushi; Ochi, Mitsuo

Background:

Osteoarthritis affects the whole body, thus biomechanical effects on other joints should be considered. Unloading knee braces could be effective for knee osteoarthritis, but their effects on the contralateral knee and bilateral hip joints remain unknown. This study investigated the effects of bracing on the kinematics and kinetics of involved and contralateral joints during gait.

Methods:

Nineteen patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were analysed. Kinematics and kinetics of the knee and hip joints in frontal and sagittal planes were measured during walking without and with bracing on the more symptomatic knee.

Findings:

The ipsilateral hip in the braced condition showed a lower adduction angle by an average of 2.58° (range, 1.05°-4.16°) during 1%-49% of the stance phase, and a lower abduction moment at the second peak during the stance phase than the hip in the unbraced condition (P<0.05 and P<0.005, respectively). With bracing, the contralateral hip showed a more marked peak extension moment and lower abduction moment at the first peak (P<0.05), and the contralateral knee adduction angle increased by an average of 0.32° (range, 0.21°-0.45°) during 46%-55% of the stance phase (P<0.05), compared to no bracing.

Interpretation:

Unloading bracing modified the contralateral knee adduction angle pattern at a specific time point during gait. It also affected the frontal plane on the ipsilateral hip and the frontal and sagittal planes on the contralateral hip joint. Consideration should be provided to other joints when treating knee osteoarthritis.

Brace Studied:

Unloader One®

Other Information:

Reduction in EKAM with bracing

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Ramsey, Dan K., PhD; Briem, Kristin, PT, MHSc; Axe, Michael J., MD; Snyder-Mackler, Lynn, ScD, PT, SCS

Background:

Evidence that knee braces used for the treatment of osteoarthritis mediate pain relief and improve function by unloading the joint (increasing the joint separation) remains inconclusive. Alternatively, valgus-producing braces may mediate pain relief by mechanically stabilizing the joint and reducing muscle cocontractions and joint compression. In this study, therefore, we sought to examine the degree to which so-called unloader braces control knee instability and influence muscle cocontractions during gait.

Methods:

Sixteen subjects with radiographic evidence of knee malalignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis were recruited and fitted with a custom Generation II Unloader brace. Gait analysis was performed without use of the brace and with the brace in neutral alignment and in 4 degrees of valgus alignment. A two-week washout period separated the brace conditions. Muscle cocontraction indices were derived for agonist and antagonist muscle pairings. Pain, instability, and functional status were obtained with use of self-reported questionnaires, and the results were compared.

Results:

The scores for pain, function, and stability were worst when the knee was unsupported (the baseline and washout conditions). At baseline, nine of the sixteen patients reported knee instability and five of the nine complained that it affected their activities of daily living. Poor knee stability was found to be correlated with low ratings for the activities of daily living, quality of life, and global knee function and with increased pain and symptoms. Knee function and stability scored best with the brace in the neutral setting compared with the brace in the valgus setting. The cocontraction of the vastus lateralis-lateral hamstrings was significantly reduced from baseline in both the neutral (p = 0.014) and valgus conditions (p = 0.023), and the cocontraction of the vastus medialis-medial hamstrings was significantly reduced with the valgus setting (p = 0.068), as a result of bracing. Patients with greater varus alignment had greater decreases in vastus lateralis-lateral hamstring muscle cocontraction.

Conclusions:

When knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis are braced, neutral alignment performs as well as or better than valgus alignment in reducing pain, disability, muscle cocontraction, and knee adduction excursions. Pain relief may result from diminished muscle cocontractions rather than from so-called medial compartment unloading.

Brace Studied

Generation II Unloader®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA
• Reduction of Unicompartmental Load

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Nadaud, Matthew C., MD; Komistek, Rochard D., PhD; Mahfouz, Mohamed R., PhD; Dennis, Douglass A., MD; Anderle, Matthew R., BS

Brace Studied

Generation II Unloader®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Reduction of Unicompartmental Load

Read Full Text

Richards, J.D.; Sanchez-Ballester, J.; Jones, R.K.; Darke, N.; Livingstone, B.N.

In this cross-over study, we evaluated two types of knee brace commonly used in the conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. Twelve patients confirmed radiologically as having unilateral osteoarthritis of the medial compartment (Larsen grade 2 to grade 4) were studied. Treatment with a simple hinged brace was compared with that using a valgus corrective brace. Knee kinematics, ground reaction forces, pain and function were assessed during walking and the Hospital for Special Surgery scores were also determined. Significant improvements in pain, function, and loading and propulsive forces were seen with the valgus brace. Treatment with a simple brace showed only significant improvements in loading forces. Our findings suggest that although both braces improved confidence and function during gait, the valgus brace showed greater benefit.

Brace Studied

Generation II Unloader®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Pollo, Fabian E., PhD; Otis, James C., PhD; Backus, Sherry I., MA, PT; Warren, Russel F., MD; Wickiewicz, Thomas L., MD

Background:

Patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee may be treated nonoperatively with adjustable valgus bracing.

Hypothesis:

Valgus bracing reduces load on the medial compartment through the application of an external valgus moment about the knee, resulting in pain relief.

Study Design:

Prospective cohort study.

Methods:

Eleven patients were tested using an instrumented brace and three-dimensional gait analysis. We measured the valgus moment applied by the adjustable valgus brace and determined the compressive load in the medial compartment. We also documented the effects of increased valgus alignment of the brace and increased strap tension on load sharing. Pain and activity levels were also recorded.

Results:

Pain and activity level improved in all subjects with valgus bracing. During gait, valgus bracing reduced the net varus moment about the knee by an average of 13% (7.1 N.m) and the medial compartment load at the knee by an average of 11% (114 N) in the calibrated 4 degrees valgus brace setting. Increasing valgus alignment with the adjustable brace had a greater effect on the medial compartment load than did increasing strap tension.

Conclusion:

Adjustable valgus bracing was effective in reducing medial compartment load and subsequent pain while also improving knee function in a group of patients with osteoarthritis.

Brace Studied

Generation II Unloader®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA
• Reduction of Unicompartmental Load

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Draper, ER; Cable, JM; Sanchez-Ballester, J; Hunt, N; Robinson, JR; Strachan, RK

The use of a valgus brace can effectively relieve the symptoms of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. This study provides an objective measurement of function by analysis of gait symmetry. This was measured in 30 patients on four separate occasions: immediately before and after initial fitting and then again at three months with the brace on and off. All patients reported immediate symptomatic improvement with less pain on walking. After fitting the brace, symmetry indices of stance and the swing phase of gait showed a consistent and immediate improvement at 0 and 3 months, respectively, of 3.92% (p = 0.030) and 3.40% (p = 0.025) in the stance phase and 11.78% (p = 0.020) and 9.58% (p = 0.005) in the swing phase. This was confirmed by a significant improvement at three months in the mean Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score from 69.9 to 82.0 (p < 0.001). Thus, wearing a valgus brace gives a significant and immediate improvement in the function of patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee, as measured by analysis of gait symmetry.

Brace Studied

Generation II Unloader®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Katsuragawa, Y; Fukui, N; Nakamura, K

We assessed the clinical knee score and bone mineral density of the proximal tibia in an attempt to evaluate the efficacy of valgus knee bracing. The knee score improved after 3 months, and increases in bone mineral density were seen more in the lateral tibial condyle than in the medial. These results suggest that the brace acts by transferring the forces across the knee joint from the medial to the lateral side.

Brace Studied

Generation II®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA
• Reduction of Unicompartmental Load

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Kirkley A; Webster-Bogaert S; Litchfield R; Amendola A; MacDonald S; McCalden R; Fowler P

Background:

The purpose of this study was to compare a custom-made valgus-producing functional knee (unloader) brace, a neoprene sleeve, and medical treatment only (control group) with regard to their ability to improve the disease-specific quality of life and the functional status of patients who had osteoarthritis in association with a varus deformity of the knee (varus gonarthrosis).

Methods:

The study design was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Patients who had varus gonarthrosis were screened for eligibility. The criteria for exclusion included arthritides other than osteoarthritis; an operation on the knee within the previous six months; symptomatic disease of the hip, ankle, or foot; a previous fracture of the tibia or femur; morbid obesity (a body-mass index of more than thirty-five kilograms per square meter); skin disease; peripheral vascular disease or varicose veins that would preclude use of a brace; a severe cardiovascular deficit; blindness; poor English-language skills; and an inability to apply a brace because of physical limitations such as arthritis in the hand or an inability to bend over. Treatment was assigned on the basis of a computer-generated block method of randomization with use of sealed envelopes. The patients were stratified according to age (less than fifty years or at least fifty years), deformity (the mechanical axis in less than 5 degrees of varus or in at least 5 degrees of varus), and the status of the anterior cruciate ligament (torn or intact). The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: medical treatment only (control group), medical treatment and use of a neoprene sleeve, or medical treatment and use of an unloader brace. The disease-specific quality of life was measured with use of the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire (MACTAR), and function was assessed with use of the six-minute walking and thirty-second stair-climbing tests. The primary outcome measure consisted of an analysis of covariance of the change in scores between the baseline and six-month evaluations.

Results:

One hundred and nineteen patients were randomized. The control group consisted of forty patients (thirty-one men and nine women; mean age, 60.9 years); the neoprene-sleeve group, of thirty-eight patients (twenty-seven men and eleven women; mean age, 58.2 years); and the unloader-brace group, of forty-one patients (twenty-eight men and thirteen women; mean age, 59.5 years). Nine patients withdrew from the study. At the six-month follow-up evaluation, there was a significant improvement in the disease-specific quality of life (p = 0.001) and in function (p< or =0.001) in both the neoprene-sleeve group and the unloader-brace group compared with the control group. There was a significant difference between the unloader-brace group and the neoprene-sleeve group with regard to pain after both the six-minute walking test (p = 0.021) and the thirty-second stair-climbing test (p = 0.016). There was a strong trend toward a significant difference between the unloader-brace group and the neoprene-sleeve group with regard to the change in the WOMAC aggregate (p = 0.062) and WOMAC physical function scores (p = 0.081).

Conclusions:

The results indicate that patients who have varus gonarthrosis may benefit significantly from use of a knee brace in addition to standard medical treatment. The unloader brace was, on the average, more effective than the neoprene sleeve. The ideal candidates for each of these bracing options remain to be identified.

Brace Studied

Generation II Unloader®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Lindenfeld, TN; Hewett, TE; Andriacchi TP

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a brace designed to unload varus degenerative knees actually alters medial compartment loads by decreasing the adduction moment. Eleven patients who had arthrosis confined to the medial compartment were fitted with a valgus brace and tested before and after brace wear with pain and function scoring instruments and by automated gait analysis. The biomechanical data from these patients were compared with those from 11 healthy control subjects. Scores from an analog pain scale decreased 48% with brace wear, and function with activities of daily living increased 79%. Mean adduction moment without the brace measured 4.0 +/- 0.8% body weight times height versus 3.6 +/- 0.8% body weight times height when wearing the brace (10% decrease). The mean adduction moment for control subjects was 3.5 +/- 0.6% body weight times height. Thus, the mean adduction moment decreased from approximately one standard deviation from the normal mean to a value that is similar to the control value. Nine of 11 patients had a decrease in the adduction moment with the brace, five of 11 patients had a reduction higher than 10%, and decreases in this moment were as high as 32%. This study shows that pain, function, and biomechanical knee loading can be altered by a brace designed to unload the medial compartment of the knee

Brace Studied

Generation II Unloader® (copy from Bid Sky Medical)

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA
• Reduction of Unicompartmental Load

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Hiroaki Matsuno MD,PhD, Ken Morris Kadowaki MD, PhD, Haruo Tsuji MD, PhD

Objective:

To investigate the clinical efficacy of the Generation II (G II) knee brace, a newly developed knee orthosis, on patients experiencing severe medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Design:

Case series.

Setting:

A national medical and pharmaceutical hospital in Japan.

Patients:

Twenty primary OA subjects (excluding those with secondary OA), all older than 55 years of age and experiencing only knee joint problems, were selected according to their ability to walk more than 500 meters independent of support. These patients had arthritis in both knees and no less than one half of normal joint space remaining as revealed by roentgenogram studies. The more severely affected side was selected for bracing.

Interventions:

For 12 months, each patient wore a G II knee brace on the affected knee on a daily basis, removing it only at night. To evaluate the effects of G II OA brace alone, additional use of new oral drugs or any other treatment was prohibited from 1 month before application of the G II OA brace and throughout the trial period.

Main Outcome Measures:

Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Japan Orthopaedic Association's knee scoring system. X-ray evaluation was performed with patients standing on one leg. A dynamometer was used to evaluate isokinetic quadriceps muscle strength. The center of gravity was measured using an X-Y recording. Clinical evaluation was performed every 2 months thereafter. Final evaluation was at 12 months.

Results:

Nineteen of the 20 patients answered that they experienced significant pain relief. Knee pain scores on walking increased from 18.0 to 21.5 and on ascending and descending stairs increased from 12.8 to 15.8. The femorotibial angle decreased in 12 of the patients, and the mean angle decreased from 185.1 degrees before application to 183.7 degrees with the brace on at the final observation period. In addition, isokinetic quadriceps muscle strength increased from an average of 36.8 Nm to 42.8 Nm for all patients. In 17 patients, quadriceps muscle strength increased, while it decreased in 2 and remained the same in 1. Finally, lateral movement of the center of gravity decreased compared with before G II application in all patients.

Conclusion:

G II bracing is a beneficial treatment for severe medial OA of the knee.

Brace Studied

Generation II Unloader®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA
• Functional Improvements Knee OA
• Reduction of Unicompartmental Load

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

Horlick Simon G. B.Sc. M.D.; Loomer, Richard L. B.A., M.D.

Conclusion:

No change in tibiofemoral angles

87% reported pain relief when the brace was in valgus, 67% with the brace in neutral and 56% with no brace. 93% of the patients in the medial hinge group reported continuous use of the brace post 20 months follow up

Brace Studied:

Generation II Unloader®

Unloader Claims Supported:

• Pain Reduction Knee OA

Read Abstract

Read Full Text

London 2019 Expert Consensus for Knee OA

London 2019 Expert Consensus for Knee OA

London 2019 Expert Consensus for Knee OA

Dr. Femi Ayeni

McMaster University, Ontario, Canada

Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI) with hip osteoarthritis (OA). FAI, also known as hip impingement, is a condition that causes pain in the young adult’s hip and is the result of a mismatch in shape and size between the femoral head/neck and acetabulum (ball and socket joint of the hip).

Expert Consensus for Hip OA