Contact Us at Össur Canada - CLICK HERE

Innovation Rooted in Technology, Inspired by People

Our Design Philosophy Begins with the User: What problems do people who wear prosthetic devices face every day that can be improved through technology?


This question continues to push us to develop technology that raises the standard for prosthetic users and moves the industry forward.

The Challenges Facing People Who Wear Prosthetic Legs

Lower limb amputation can affect gait dynamics and increase loads on the remaining joints, among other comorbidities. Knee osteoarthritis is 17 times more common in below-knee amputees compared to the general population. For diabetic or dysvascular amputees, increased loads can also contribute to foot ulcers, potentially requiring further surgery.

Pro-Flex is a step in the right direction.

Compared to a conventional energy storing and return feet, Pro-Flex feet are designed to create exceptional mechanical power and range of ankle motion to reduce stress on the sound side.

Over a lifetime of steps, the potential health benefits are clear.

Pro-Flex feet are the latest innovation in the development of prosthetic foot technology. Developed in the 1980s, the Flex-Foot was the first carbon fiber, energy-storing and returning (ESAR) prosthetic foot and a huge quality of life improvement from the previous standard, SACH feet. Össur acquired Flex-Foot in 2000 and built on that technology platform, coming out with the Pro-Flex Pivot which formed the basis of the technology platform for the Pro-Flex family. Since then, the Pro-Flex family has expanded with different users and their needs in mind.

The Pro-Flex DNA


Full Length Asymmetric Footblade + Split Toe

Full effective toe length and design contribute to a more fluid and natural progression from heel strike to toe off than a conventional energy storing and return foot.

Three-Blade Design

All Pro-Flex feet use a proprietary, unique 3-blade design, which enhance range-of-motion and energy return compared to a conventional energy storing and return foot which often only use a 2-blade design.

A Foot for Everyone

Each Pro-Flex carbon fiber prosthetic foot is developed with different users and their unique challenges in mind. Factors like build height, activity level, lifestyle and finances are all important considerations when selecting a foot.

Meet Our Feet


It all started with Pro-Flex Pivot which utilized the 3-blade design that forms the basis of the Pro-Flex DNA. Last year, we brought the Pro-Flex Terra to market with new innovations like a pre-compressed top blade and snap-on foot cover. All Pro-Flex feet are designed with specific user profiles in mind and utilize sophisticated engineering to address the specific problems that people who wear prosthetic feet face.

Read more

Pro-Flex Pivot

Making Walking Easier for a Decade

Read more

Pro-Flex XC & Pro-Flex XC Torsion

The Industry Standard ESAR Foot

Read more

Pro-Flex LP Align

Heel Height Adjustable Up to 7 cm

Read more

Pro-Flex Terra

Unparalleled Versatility and Energy Return

Read more

Pro-Flex LP and Pro-Flex LP Torsion

Best-in-Class Low Profile Foot

Read more

Pro-Flex ST

Smooth rollover and controlled push off

Read more

Pro-Flex Modular

Customizable Shank Height

Unity for All

Whether an above-knee or below-knee, low active or high active, mechanical or microprocessor solution is required, the Unity Sleeveless Vacuum System offers the flexibility to combine a variety of Össur feet and knees to achieve the desired combination of equipment for each unique user. 

Adding an elevated vacuum system to a prosthesis with a Seal-In liner leads to:  

  • Reduced pistoning 3,4,5
  • Reduced volume fluctuations 10,14  
  • Improved balance 15  
  • Reduced risk of falls 15,16  

Designed with the user’s comfort in mind, Unity controls the stump volume by reducing fluctuations in the residual limb and improves socket fit for greater comfort.   

Note: Unity is not available for Pro-Flex LP Align, Pro-Flex Terra, and Pro-Flex Modular.

Learn More


Curious to learn how to incorporate Pro-Flex feet into your practice? Fill out the form below and get more information about how to pair the right Pro-Flex with your patients.

Fields marked * are required
Canada
References

  1. W. L. Childers and S. R. Wurdeman, “Chapter 42: Transtibial Amputation: Prosthetic Management,” in Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies, vol. 2016, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.  
  2. M. D. Muller, “Chapter 46: Transfemoral Amputation: Prosthetic Management,” in Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2016. 
  3. W. J. Board, G. M. Street, and C. Caspers, “A comparison of trans‐tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 202–209, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1080/03093640108726603. 
  4. B. J. Darter, K. Sinitski, and J. M. Wilken, “Axial bone–socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., p. 0309364615605372, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0309364615605372.  
  5. G. K. Klute, J. S. Berge, W. Biggs, S. Pongnumkul, Z. Popovic, and B. Curless, “Vacuum-Assisted Socket Suspension Compared With Pin Suspension for Lower Extremity Amputees: Effect on Fit, Activity, and Limb Volume,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1570–1575, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.019. 
  6. Safari, M. R. & Meier, M. R. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs-Part 1: Qualitative outcomes. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 52, 491–508 (2015).  
  7. Gholizadeh, H., Abu Osman, N. A., Eshraghi, A. & Ali, S. Transfemoral prosthesis suspension systems: a systematic review of the literature. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93, 809–823 (2014).  
  8. Gholizadeh, H., Abu Osman, N. A., Eshraghi, A., Ali, S. & Razak, N. A. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature. Clin. Biomech. Bristol Avon 29, 87–97 (2014).  
  9. Highsmith, M. J. & Highsmith, J. T. Chapter 56: Skin Problems in the Amputee. in Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies 677–696 (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2016).  
  10. Baars, E. C. T. & Geertzen, J. H. B. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 29, 27–37 (2005).  
  11. Dickinson, A. S., Steer, J. W. & Worsley, P. R. Finite element analysis of the amputated lower limb: A systematic review and recommendations. Med. Eng. Phys. 43, 1–18 (2017).  
  12. Klute, G. K., Glaister, B. C. & Berge, J. S. Prosthetic liners for lower limb amputees: a review of the literature. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 34, 146–153 (2010).  
  13. K. Carroll, “Lower Extremity Socket Design and Suspension,” Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 31–48, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.11.001.  
  14. J. Goswami, R. Lynn, G. Street, and M. Harlander, “Walking in a vacuum-assisted socket shifts the stump fluid balance,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 2003.  
  15. C. B. Samitier, L. Guirao, M. Costea, J. M. Camós, and E. Pleguezuelos, “The benefits of using a vacuum-assisted socket system to improve balance and gait in elderly transtibial amputees,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 83–88, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0309364614546927.  
  16. N. J. Rosenblatt and T. Ehrhardt, “The effect of vacuum assisted socket suspension on prospective, community-based falls by users of lower limb prostheses,” Gait Posture, vol. 55, pp. 100–104, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.038.  
  17. S. Ali, N. A. Abu Osman, M. M. Naqshbandi, A. Eshraghi, M. Kamyab, and H. Gholizadeh, “Qualitative study of prosthetic suspension systems on transtibial amputees’ satisfaction and perceived problems with their prosthetic devices.,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 1919–23, Nov. 2012.